Financial Performance Of United Breweries Limited Finance Essay

Published: November 26, 2015 Words: 2236

The present report is a unique effort to highlight the exuberance and performance of the United Breweries Ltd., a inimitable company, and the report, in a nutshell, has tried to give glimpse on the company position, the industry analysis, comparative status, products, its core competency, SWOT analysis, generic strategy, resource strength etc. UB Group started in 1915, with Thomson Leishman, a Scotsman. This Company was bought over by Late Vittal Mallya in 1947. The present chairman of the UB Group is Dr. Vijay Mallya.

Kingfisher, the Group's most visible and profitable brand, made a modest entry in the sixties. With currently into business of Spirits (United Spirits Ltd.), Wine, Beer (United breweries Ltd.), Engineering (UB Engineering Limited), Fertilizers (Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilizers) company has made its mark and presence in each sector it is in. United Breweries Limited (UBL) - has assumed undisputed market leadership with a national market share of 48% through a process of aggressive acquisition and market penetration. Company has upgraded most of its breweries with latest equipment to produce world class beer. Despite a recessionary trend prevailing in India, Company was able to maintain its market share and leadership position. Company achieved a milestone in the month of March 2009 by selling over 10 million cases in a single month, the highest ever sale recorded in a month. Company has undertaken market focused initiatives and internal measures to contain costs and improve margins.

The UB Group today controls 60% of the total manufacturing capacity for Beer in India. The flagship brand, Kingfisher is now sold in over 52 countries worldwide having received many accolades for its quality. As an economic force, India is believed to hold the potential to grow faster than any other BRIC country over the next thirty to fifty years. The sub-continent's Beer market has been equally dynamic, growing by almost 90% since the turn of the Century. Exceptionally high growth was generated in the northern states of Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan which took full advantage of reduced taxes and improvements in the distribution policy. In contrast to Russia, consumers are displaying a distinct preference for Strong Beer which has gained market share steadily in recent years and now accounts for almost 70% of total volume. Kingfisher Strong replaced Kingfisher Premium as the leading Beer and the Kingfisher brand overall now holds a commanding position.

Valuation of UBL using time series analysis of its financial ratio's was performed. The firm maintained high level of liquidity. Owner's fund formed in major source of finance for its expanding activities. The firm is financially more stable which is good sign for its creditors. Efficient inventory management system been efficiently turning the inventory. However idle current assets, inefficient credit and collection performance and low proportion of debt in capital structure has been the concern for UBL.

The day is not far away when the UBL Company will fly its flag at number 1 position.

INDUSTRY ANALYSIS

Beer market in India is estimated to be around Rs. 3000 crores. The industry has been witnessing on an average , a steady growth of about 10% per year over the last 10 years. With a relatively younger population and income levels on the rise, India is seeing an increase in the popularity of beer. United Breweries Group and SABMiller are the major players in the industry. UBL claims the market leadership with 48% of the market share.

PORTER'S FIVE FORCE MODEL

The industry is characterized by low threat of new entrants, low determinants of supplier power, high rivalry among firms, high determinants of buyer power and low threat to substitute products.

Threat of new entrants (low)

Stringent govt. policies & taxes

High capital requirement

Less access to distribution channel

Threat to substitute products (low)

No close substitute but distant substitutes are available.

High brand loyalty

Determinants of buyer power (high)

No. of buyers are high

Buyer switching cost is low

Low buyer's threat to backward integration

Determinants of supplier power (low)

Suppliers are numerous

Products used to brew are inexpensive

Suppliers threat to forward integration is low

Buyer's threat of backward integration

Low suppliers product differentiation

Rivalry among existing firms (high)

Industry growth rate is high

Competitor less diversified

Relative size of competitor is large

GOVERNMENT POLICY

Local excise is paid when the company supplies its material to local dealers

Excise is Rs. 9/- per bluck liters i.e. 1 bluck liters is 7.8 liter. (12 x 650ml).

Library Tax: it is collected by govt. to build libraries in different talukas of Goa.

Health Surcharge: 2% on 1 bluck liters rate (Rs. 9/- on 7.8 liters 9 x 7.8 = 70 is excise duty)

VAT is charged 20% on total value and TCS is1% on total value

COMPANY ANALYSIS

The UB Group stands as a giant conglomerate company operating worldwide with 7 major lines of business, i.e. Beverage Alcohol, Pharmaceuticals, Media, International Trading, Fertilizer, Research & Development, Aviation and a turnover exceeding US$ One Billion (over Rs. 40 Billion).: The present chairman of the UB Group is Dr. Vijay Mallya.

UBL-GOA

UBL-Goa, a unit of United Breweries Ltd., located at Bethoda, Ponda, Goa, started its commercial production of beer on 17th October 1972 with the capacity of 27,000 doz. Per month. From 1989 onwards, expansion was at regular intervals. At present the bottling plant can produce 5,500,00- cases per annum and is maintaining a highly motivated workforce of 140 employees and 30 staff members.

UB VISION STATEMENT

TO BECOME NO.1 BREWERY IN WORLD.

ORGANISATION STRUCTURE

PRODUCT PROFILE

The only company in the business with a comprehensive brand portfolio, with mix of strong national and regional brands that carter to different need states of the customer.

Kingfisher Lager

Kingfisher Light Lager

Kingfisher Strong Lager

Kingfisher Super Strong Lager

Flying Horse Royal Lager

Kalyani Black Label Strong Lager

Premium Ice Beer

Raj Cobra

Taj Mahal Premium Lager

WORK FLOW MODEL

Brew House

Mesh Kettle

Lautar Turn

Process dept.

Wort kettle

Holding kettle

Whirl pool

Fermentation

Fermentation dept.

Cold Storage

Filtration

Filtration

Filling

Capping

Production dept.

Pasteurization

Labeling

Packing

Sealing

Dispatch

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

Manage cash and fund in an effective and efficient manner.

Keep all records of expenditure.

Effective Management of working capital.

Liasioning with govt. authorities, bankers and auditors

Statutory compliances .

Preparation of projections and estimates of financial statements and cash flows

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

NAVISION is the Management Information System used by UBL. Each department of UBL exhibits Navision Software which helps Departmental head to communicate with. It also helps to file day to day report to the Divisional Head of UB. The information is updated daily at Divisional level and then closings of each department are done at Head office. This software helps the Head Office to know the day to day working of each Divisional office and based on the information, each and every office can be controlled.

RESOURCE STRENGTH

DISTINCTIVE CAPABILITY OF THE FIRM

Management team

Professionally Managed

Seasoned Professionals with Significant Industry Experience

Segment market presence

Least Vulnerable to Policy Volatility due to Large Spread

Manufacturing technology

Largest Manufacturing Space

Maximum Capital Utilization

Branding

Strongest Brand

Significant Up gradation

Value Chain Ownership

Initiatives Planned for Integrating into Retailing

CORE COMPETENCY

Strong brand image with continuous innovation and technology along with good marketing and distribution channel.

GENERIC STRATEGY

UBL follows:-

Differentiated strategy by

marketing their product by associating their brand with major events

Focused strategy by

introducing region specific products

COMPETITOR ANALYSIS

SABMiller India, a wholly owned subsidiary of SABMiller plc, one of the world`s leading brewers, with its innovative measures in packaging, pricing, occasion and product gaps, has cornered nearly 38% of the Indian beer market.

Asia Pacific Breweries Limited, Carlsberg and Crown Beers India forms the remaining 14% of the market share.

COMPANY'S FUTURE GROWTH AND PROSPECTS

United Breweries limited and Heineken join hands to lead Indian beer market.

The company is planning of new product development by extending its product line which would provide its customers' more enriched flavors.

The beer-drinkers in the country are much younger than the average beer-drinker elsewhere in the world. This makes them more likely to carry the brand with them for a lifetime.

SWOT ANALYSIS

UBL holds the strongest position in the market with immense opportunities to explore.

STRENGTHS

Strong Brand name.

Technology

Finest Quality & innovative

Market share of the company

Reverse Integration

Economic price of the product

Global presence of the brand

Aggressive advertising

Financial backing of the UB

Acquisition strategy

WEAKNESSES

Expensive brand management

Static market growth rate

OPPORTUNITIES

Growing beer market

New product development.

Entering into government venture to improve penetration

Expansion and acquisition plan

THREATS

Entry of global beer companies

Increase in raw material prices

High Taxes & Regulations

Advertising and market restriction

Cloning of successful brands

Growth in substitutes

Economic downturn

Negative perceptions about beer

PROJECT UNDERTAKEN

TITLE : ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF UBL

OBJECTIVE : To evaluate the financial performance of UBL from the year 2006 to 2008, using time series analysis of its financial ratios.

METHODOLOGY :

Compare the ratio's from the year 2006 to 2008.

Determine the direction of change.

Analyze the reason for the change.

Remark whether the firm's financial performance has improved, deteriorated or remained constant over time.

Following financial ratios were calculated and analyzed:-

LIQUIDITY RATIOS

Liquidity ratios measure the ability of the firm to meet its current obligations.

RATIO

2006

2007

2008

2009

Current ratio

4.14

3.16

2.34

4.27

Quick ratio

3.67

2.62

1.85

3.55

Cash ratio

0.81

0.66

0.03

1.85

Interval measure (days)

344

335

130

183

UBL has been maintaining a high degree of liquidity, compared to the conventional value of 2:1, which is attributed to its high cash and bank balances, and loans and advances . This high value has deteriorated from 2006 to 2008. But liquidity again raised considerably in 2009, owing to substantial increase in quick assets.

LEVERAGE RATIOS

Leverage ratios judge the long term financial leverage and the risk of firm.

RATIO

2006

2007

2008

2009

Debt-ratio

0.34

0.46

0.46

0.36

Debt-equity ratio

0.51

0.86

0.87

0.58

Capital employed to net worth

1.51

1.86

1.87

1.58

Total liability to total assets ratio

0.48

0.58

0.60

0.49

Interest coverage ratio

4.46

5.77

4.6

2.98

UBL is very conservative in using debt and depends more on owner's funds to finance its expanding activities. Though the level of debt is not excessive, its proportion has increased from 2006 to 2008, with owner's again contributing more in 2009. Half of the company's assets are financed by outsider's money. The stake of owner's is quite high in the total capital employed. For creditors, the trend is satisfactory, while, for investors, this could mean disadvantageous.

ACTIVITY RATIOS

Activity ratio's reflect firm's efficiency in managing and utilizing its assets.

RATIO

2006

2007

2008

2009

Inventory turnover

12.16

13.45

16.37

15.46

Days of inventory holding

25.59

26.74

21.97

23.28

Debtor's turnover

6.96

6.89

6.14

5.23

Average collection period

51.65

52.19

58.61

68.76

Net asset turnover

1.28

1.51

1.90

2.11

Total asset turnover

1.04

1.24

1.54

1.40

Fixed asset turnover

4.30

2.81

2.75

3.13

Current asset turnover

1.37

2.22

3.50

2.55

Net current asset

1.81

3.25

6.11

3.33

UBL's efficiency in turning its inventory is improving, which in turn has decreased the yearly inventory holding. The average collection period has been increasing mainly due to liberal and inefficient credit and collection performance. UBL turns over its fixed assets faster than current assets. From 2006 to 2008 current asset turnover has increased while utilization of fixed assets declined. But, 2009 witnessed reversal of this trend, due to considerable decrease in capital WIP and increase in sundry debtors, loans and advances.

POFITABILITY RATIOS

Profitability ratio's measure's overall performance and effectiveness of the firm.

RATIO

2006

2007

2008

2009

Gross profit margin

0.30

0.26

0.25

0.26

Net profit margin

0.02

0.04

0.03

0.02

Operating expense ratio

0.65

0.64

0.63

0.63

Return on investment

0.06

0.06

0.07

0.07

Return on equity

0.03

0.11

0.10

0.05

Earnings per share

4.67

2.62

2.49

2.29

Dividends per share

2.51

1.09

0.45

1.04

Dividends payout ratio (%)

53.74

41.60

18.07

45.41

Dividend yield (%)

0.1678

0.4090

0.2412

1.1626

Earnings yield (%)

0.3123

0.9831

1.334

2.560

Price earnings ratio

320.2

101.7

74.96

39.06

Market value to book value ratio

63.70

10.32

6.59

1.94

Profit margin of UBL has been marginally deteriorating due to its high selling and promotion expenses, though there is decline in operating expense ratio. Over the years Return on investment has remained almost constant. Decrease in return on equity is attributed to the use of less debt over the years.

Company's EPS and DPS are decreasing. The proportionate decrease in DPS in more than that in the EPS and therefore dividend payout ratio is declining. However DPS has doubled in 2009. EPS is decreasing due to the minimal use of debt by the firm. As a result the market price of the share have come down, which in turn have decreased price earnings ratio. The market value to book value has also declined. Thus in terms of market performance the company is showing deterioration.

CONCLUSION :

Idle current assets, liberal and inefficient credit and collection performance, and low proportion of debt in capital structure, has raised the concerns of high liquidity, increasing credit collection period, decreasing current asset turnover, decreasing ROE, and low EPS. Thus UBL should reduce or employ idle current assets efficiently, revise credit collection policy, and raise debt proportion to strike a proper debt-equity mix.

THE END