Advantages And Disadvantages Of Managing Financial Principal And Techniques Finance Essay

Published: November 26, 2015 Words: 2746

The main objectives of the task are

What Is Cost forecasting?

Benefits of Cost forecast for the future

Identify the available sources of fund.

Selection of suitable method to obtain the fund.

This task analyzes the cost forecasting techniques and its application for the real life situation. Also have to evaluate the price changes and the grounding sourcing for the future fund requirements.

No business can know exactly what the future holds. But budgeting reduces the level of uncertainty, helping you anticipate problems, learn from the past and improve your ability to control the business.

Forecasting is a technique to predict or estimate for an unknown situation mainly in the business criteria it's used to estimate the values for the future. It is one of the main important issues for a business.

Companies need to forecast the demand and the future trend of their business for effective decision makings.

Advantages of forecasting

Provides the ability to see the future

Helps to work according to the future

Help the organization to do their future plan and can coordinate with each other

Help to utilize the available resources.

Disadvantages of forecasting

It is difficult to predict the future

The changes may occur in any field and it'll affect the demand for the future

It is also difficult to achieve the forecasted figures in real time

Methods of forecasting

These are the commonly used methods for business level forecasting.

Scattered diagram

High-Low method

Linear method

Regression methods

Introduction for the Company 'X'

2005

2006

2007

2008

Sales (£)

306 357

309 640

398 459

428 295

Cost (£)

293 979

294 761

376 805

400 765

Profit (£)

12 378

14 879

21 654

27530Company 'X' is a film CD's provider company located in UK. 'X' provides its application focused on the satisfaction of their clients and according to their policy they are able to provide their products with good result. Since it's a profit making company in the market in the past years still they have the opportunity to continue their operations with a high profit. But they also have the impact of the economical crisis and in the position to forecast their future based on this crisis.

Detail of the company 'X'

Scattered diagram

Scattered diagram is an appropriate model to investigate the future trend of the data. This diagram shows the type of relationships among the variables.

Mainly choose the scattered diagram for the below reasons.

It gives the better understanding between the variables

Less number of data is enough for the decision making

Easy to illustrate non-linear values.

Easy to predict the future values

But in the real time situation it's advisable to use other methods also and compare the final results.

Forecasting for the future

Cost forecast

(£)

Forecasted value = £ 440 000

Revenue forecast

(£)

Forecasted value = £ 475 000

RPI

RPI helps to analyze the inflation rate of the particular country and it also provides the money value for based on the environmental changes.

RPI for UK

Year

Annual %

Index

2008

0.9

212.9

2007

4.0

210.9

2006

4.4

202.7

2005

2.2

194.1

1

RPI calculation

For Revenue

RPI = Sum of money (£) x (Later date RPI/ Earlier date RPI)

= £ 475 000 * (212.9/ 210.9)

= £479 504

For Cost

RPI = Sum of money (£) x (Later date RPI/ Earlier date RPI)

= £ 440 000 * (212.9/ 210.9)

= £ 444 173

Sources of fund

There are several sources available to get the fund for an organization. It is possible for an organization to get the fund from internal entities and external entities.

Internal sources

Personal savings

Pertained profit

Sales of assets

Equity shares

External Sources

Ordinary Shares

Preference shares

Debentures

Loans

Bank overdrafts

Factoring

Leasing

Since Company 'X' is earning enough profit, due to the current situation it is better for them to get some additional fund for the following period of time.

The internal sources are not suitable to make the money for the normal operations. It is reasonable to obtain the money from the internal sources whenever they want to invest somewhere.

To get the money from shares is not easy since they already have a prior plan to do so. And the other external methods than the bank loans is not suitable at this time.

So the suggestion for the company is to go for a bank loan which is more secure in the current situation since they have the capacity to get it.

The Manager,

Barclays Bank

Harrow

Dear Sir / Madam,

REQUEST FOR A BANK LOAN

We are one of the film CD's company in Wembley, earning a quiet amount of profit. The success makes us to expand our business further by getting more projects for the company which needs additional investment.

Currently we are doing business only in Wembley but we got the opportunity to start to start or to expand our business in other areas than Wembley where we have a high potential to succeed by earning a huge profit within a short period of time. Our market researches show that we will have good demand over there.

For initial investment we need at least £30 000 and from our current profit and savings we are able to get £ 5000 and for the rest amount £25 000 we planned to go for a bank loan which we believe we can get it from you. Since we are managing our accounts with your branch for a certain period of time hope you won't have any issues to provide us the loan.

I herewith attached the following documents for your reference.

Profit and loss account and Balance sheet for the past 5 years

Cash flow for the past 3 years

Estimated analysis for the next year.

We are maintaining a good cash flow which will help us to settle your loan within the next 3 years time.

Hope for an early and positive reply.

Yours faithfully

Mr. Bhumit

Financial controller

TASK: 2

Investment risk and sensitivity analysis

A active assessment of risks is needed. Supremacy practice, the biggest risk for numberless investments is delay. For model, irrefutable care receipts longer than expected to apparatus unaccustomed systems and train employees. The disruption blame besides cause to a loss of game.

Investment appraisal techniques

Investment is a interpretation quota of pigsty your racket. Neoteric assets consistent through equipment incumbency boost productivity, cut costs and award you a competitive edge. Investments force product boost, research and advancement, expertise and modern markets amenability unlocked up melodramatic upping opportunities.

At the identical bout, you ought to avoid overstretching limited money resources or restricting your know-how to pursue other options. Deciding locality to center your investment is an essential scrap of moulding the most of your abeyant.

Smooth a project that is unlikely to generate a profit should exhibit subjected to investment appraisal to distinguish the paramount journey to discharge its aims.

This pioneer highlights the answer money and non - cash factors you should returns into bill when considering an investment. Real and introduces the main budgetary appraisal techniques you responsibility use.

PUBLIC SECTOR Money BUDGETING

Determination constraint not betoken fabricated solely on monetary once.

Competent are issues to envisage alike now the social cost benefits.

The cost of finance that is advantageous to project cash flow is not the call one, but reasonably decisive by training on welfare of the dominion.

For central adjudicator attempts are imaginary to qualify the social costs & social gravy.

Models that are in conference rely on extensive estimation.

Further considerations exigency to epitomize liable to economical issues, political issues, social issues, technological issues.

Consideration for specific or void NPV.

Overall the verdict oftentimes larger sustained phrase fairly than the short period the instant, date, stability of power clock quantification is oftentimes difficult.

Other factors such as the environment also play a significant role.

NON FINANCIAL ASPECTS:

• Legal issues

• Ethical issues

• Change to regulation

• Political issues

• Quality implication

This task analyzes and compares two different types of projects in public and private sectors and makes the post audit appraisal for the mentioned projects. It also provides the recommendations for the projects

Advantages of NPV

It clearly shows the value of the future money

Since it shows the cash flow it's less biased.

The shareholders wealth is maximized

Disadvantages of NPV

The calculations are complex

The invest rate is assumed and the calculations are based on that assumption

May not give the fair results.

Project A

Project B

Initial investment

125000

125000

Cash flow year 1

109000

98000

year 2

97000

76000

year 3

91000

54000

year 4

76000

39000

year 5

58000

24000

year 6

47000

-5000

Notes:

The life of the project is 6 years

There is no scrap value at the end

Cost of capital is 12 %

The depreciation is calculated on straight line basis.

Depreciation is calculated according to IAS standards.

Annual depreciation

= 125000/6

=20833

Project A

Year

Cash flow

depreciation

Value

PV

Net Value

0

-125000

0

-125000

1.000

-125000.0

1

109000

20833

88167

0.893

78733.1

2

97000

20833

76167

0.797

60705.1

3

91000

20833

70167

0.712

49958.9

4

76000

20833

55167

0.636

35086.2

5

58000

20833

37167

0.567

21073.7

6

47000

20833

26167

0.507

13266.7

NPV =

133823.7

Project B

Year

Cash flow

depreciation

Value

PV

Net Value

0

-125000

0

-125000

1.000

-125000.0

1

98000

20833

77167

0.893

68910.1

2

76000

20833

55167

0.797

43968.1

3

54000

20833

33167

0.712

23614.9

4

39000

20833

18167

0.636

11554.2

5

24000

20833

3167

0.567

1795.7

6

-5000

20833

-25833

0.507

-13097.3

NPV =

11745.704

Both projects give a positive NPV hence both are acceptable. But obviously Project 'A' shows a massive return.

TASK-3

Objectives

The main objectives of the task are

Analyze the subsidiaries

Do the ratio analysis

Compare the ratios

Provide comments about the performance

This task analyses two different types of subsidiaries of a company and study the income statement and balance sheet of the companies and do a ratio analysis for both and provide the explanation of the analysis. Also provide comments on the statistics by concerning the internal and external factors.

Below is the income statement and summary balance sheet (with figures in 4m) for two subsidiaries.

Income statement AA BB

2005 2004 2005 2004

Turn over 31 30 20 35

Staff costs 3 2 5 6

General expenses 2 2 10 10

Depreciation 12 9 3 6

Interest 5 5 1 1

Total (22) (18) (19) (23)

Profit 9 12 1 12

Summary balance sheet

Non-current assets 1 65 134 22 22

Current assets 5 6 13 12

Total assets 170 140 35 34

Current liabilities (3) (6) (4) (4)

Debentures (47) (47)

Net assets 120 87 31 30

Shareholders' equity 120 87 31 30

TASK 3 A

As per the given financial information in task comparative financial performance of both Subsidiaries AA And BB

A) Return On Capital Employed.(ROCE) : ROCE is used to prove the value the business gains from its assets and liabilities, is used in finance as a measure of the returns that a company is realising from its capital employed. It is commonly used as a measure for comparing the performance between businesses and for assessing whether a business generates enough returns to pay for its cost of capital.

ROCE

PBIT / Capital Employed

Comp. AA

(2005) 14/ 167= 0.0838

(2004) 17/134 = 0.1268

Comp. BB

(2005) 02/31 =0.0645

(2004) 13/30 =0.4333

It shows that company BB better utilise its capital in 2005 in compare to 2004 then

Company AA.

Profit Margin refer to a measure of profitability. It is calculated by finding the net profit as a percentage of the revenue.

Net Profit / Revenue

Comp. AA

(2005) 14/31 = 0.0433

(2004) 17/30 = 0.5667

Comp. BB

(2005) 02/20 =0.1

(2004) 13/35=0.3714

The above calculation shows Company BB had 10% margin in 2005 which was 37% in 2004 .where as AA profit margins reduced from 56% to 4%.

Asset Utilisation

it measures the amount of sales generated by each pound of asset.

Turnover / Total Asset X 100 %

Comp. AA

(2005) 31/170 = 18.23 %

(2004) 30/140= 21.48 %

Comp. BB

(2005) 20/ 35 = 57.14 %

(2004) 35/34 = 102.9 %

The above ratio measured that company BB utilise 102% in 2004 and 57% in 2005 which was around 50% less and AA reduced by 15%.it means AA utilise better its Assets then BB.

Liquidity Ratios

Liquidity ratios provide information about a firm's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations. They are of particular interest to those extending short-term credit to the firm. Two frequently-used liquidity ratios are the current ratio (or working capital ratio) and the quick ratio.

The current ratio is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities:

Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities

Short-term creditors prefer a high current ratio since it reduces their risk. Shareholders may prefer a lower current ratio so that more of the firm's assets are working to grow the business. Typical values for the current ratio vary by firm and industry. For example, firms in cyclical industries may maintain a higher current ratio in order to remain solvent during downturns.

One drawback of the current ratio is that inventory may include many items that are difficult to liquidate quickly and that have uncertain liquidation values. The quick ratio is an alternative measure of liquidity that does not include inventory in the current assets. The quick ratio is defined as follows:

Quick Ratio = Current Assets - Inventory / Current Liabilities

A class of financial metrics that is used to determine a company's ability to pay off its short-terms debts obligations. Generally, higher the value of the ratio, larger the margin of safety the company possesses to cover short-term debts.

Current Asset/current liabilities

In order to measure liquidity we need to calculate

Current Ratio : Current asset / Current liabilities

Comp .A

(2006) 05/03 = 1.6667

(2007) 06/06 = 1.0000

Comp. B

(2005) 13/04 = 3.2500

(2004) 12/04 = 3.0000

It shows company BB had better liquidity to meet its liabilities then AA

Gearing Ratio

The Gearing Ratio measures the percentage of capital employed that is financed by debt and long term finance. The higher the gearing, the higher the dependence on borrowings and long term financing. The lower the gearing ratio, the higher the dependence on equity financing. Traditionally, the higher the level of gearing, the higher the level of financial risk due to the increased volatility of profits. Utilizing gearing amplifies the potential gain from an investment or project, but also increases the potential loss.

The Gearing Ratio is calculated as follows: divide Long Term Liabilities by (Equity + Long Term Liabilities) X 100 which results in a percentage.

Comp. AA

(2005) 47/120 = 0.39167

(2004) 47/87 = 0.54023

As per above calculation, we can say that AA reduce its borrowing where as BB paid its some of long term liabilities.

TASK-3 B

There are all ratio analysis give intimation for the which project is better than other project so above calculation of project AA and project BB have measure difference in all ratio , for ROCE ratio of AA and BB company BB better utilise and its capital in 2005 in compare to 2004 than company AA .

Net Profit / Revenue ratio analysis of AA and BB so the calculation shows company BB had 10% margin in 2005 which was 37% in 2004 where as AA profit margins reduce from 56 to 4 %

And the utilise ratio measured that company BB utilise 102% in 2004 and 57 % in 2005 which was around 50 % less and AA reduce by 15 % it means AA utilise better is assets then BB

And current ratio shows company BB had better liquidity to meet its liability then AA.

Conclusion:

Above analysis give information to company BB is good for the company AA but company BB manages has not less their current liquidity and not control general expenses and company BB have no debentures so it is very small and not public limited company and company turnover is less than 2004 and staff cost is very high compare to company AA and main turnover is very low so sales is also low to 2004 so company not make profit more it's $12m to $1m reduce in only one year , profit trend analysis is down side not control staff cost and general expense.